| From: | "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] extended txid docs |
| Date: | 2007-10-18 14:25:51 |
| Message-ID: | e51f66da0710180725h5eb697bayc5f14353c61a1731@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 10/17/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Thanks. Here is a version with your changes applied, plus
> > minor code cleanup and example output.
>
> I can't really see the reasoning for putting this into the PG
> documentation. It's tremendously complicated and doesn't seem like
> something very many people would want to read about. In any case
> it seems rather out of place where it is --- we don't have large
> code examples elsewhere in func.sgml.
>
> It almost looks like something that should be turned into a pgfoundry
> or contrib module.
The whole point of the functions it to allow doing snapshot-based
queries. It is indeed tricky, but that increases the need for
documentaton, no?
I think the last "more realistic code" section can be dropped,
it shows more user-friendly function but adds nothing new,
and the code is rather unreadeable.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-10-18 14:26:27 | Strange error dropping foreign key |
| Previous Message | qljsystems | 2007-10-18 14:23:03 | I've discovered an error with the tcl pgmail function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-10-18 14:39:20 | Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled |
| Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-10-18 14:19:31 | Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled |