| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add support for AT LOCAL |
| Date: | 2023-10-07 01:35:06 |
| Message-ID: | e3b4c42d-739d-4375-9401-2f62ad59d326@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/6/23 07:05, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> I haven't yet finished my review of the patch, still looking at it.
I realized that my regression tests are not exercising what I originally
intended them to after this change. They are supposed to show that
calling the function explicitly or using AT LOCAL is correctly
reproduced by ruleutils.c.
The attached v4 changes the regression tests (and nothing else).
--
Vik Fearing
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4-0001-Add-support-for-AT-LOCAL.patch | text/x-patch | 11.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-10-07 02:42:37 | Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-10-07 01:18:01 | Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text |