Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v12

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, samay sharma <smilingsamay(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v12
Date: 2022-09-07 07:53:55
Message-ID: e3ae16de-c9f9-f559-2d11-70b1342ae3d1@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07.09.22 09:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This could also be combined with the idea of the postgres.sgml.valid
> thing you have in the meson patch set.
>
> I'll finish this up and produce a proper patch.

Something like this.

This does make the rules more straightforward and avoids repeated
xmllint calls. I suppose this also helps writing the meson rules in a
simpler way.

A possible drawback is that the intermediate postgres-full.xml file is
>10MB, but I guess we're past the point where we are worrying about
that kind of thing.

I don't know if there is any performance difference between xsltproc
reading one big file versus many smaller files.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Run-xmllint-validation-only-once.patch text/plain 4.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-09-07 08:02:35 Re: PostgreSQL 15 Beta 4 release announcement draft
Previous Message Ibrar Ahmed 2022-09-07 07:53:07 Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks