| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | postgres_fdw: Add support for INSERT OVERRIDING clause |
| Date: | 2017-10-31 15:45:25 |
| Message-ID: | e3a42b23-4dd0-6570-f4f6-6a27d7207c39@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
It has been pointed out to me that the command deparsing in postgres_fdw
does not support the INSERT OVERRIDING clause that was added in PG10.
Here is a patch that seems to fix that. I don't know much about this,
whether anything else needs to be added or whether there should be
tests. Perhaps someone more familiar with postgres_fdw details can
check it.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-postgres_fdw-Add-support-for-INSERT-OVERRIDING-claus.patch | text/plain | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2017-10-31 15:48:39 | Re: Anyone have experience benchmarking very high effective_io_concurrency on NVME's? |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-10-31 15:25:03 | Re: pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug |