Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?

From: "Relaxin" <me(at)yourhouse(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?
Date: 2006-04-12 02:04:16
Message-ID: e1hn6m$25ln$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-novice
"Alan Hodgson" <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> wrote in message 
> On April 9, 2006 07:02 am, "Relaxin" <me(at)yourhouse(dot)com> wrote:
> I think if you try both products, under any kind of concurrent read/write
> load, especially if you use MySQL in a non-default manner that actually
> guarantees safe data (ie. with InnoDB or at least by turning fsync on),
> you will find that PostgreSQL compares quite favourably speed-wise, while
> at the same time being just a much nicer product to work with.
> This is of course just my opinion.  I invite you to try the product before
> dismissing it based on what some other people have to say.

Thank you Alan for your response.

What I need ( and other novice)  what are all of the parameters for and how 
would you set them up properly, so that we can also see the performance 
benefits of PG?

I need this information for PG for Windows...I'm sure others need it for 


In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2006-04-12 03:00:06
Subject: Re: advice on setting up schema sought
Previous:From: Sean McCuneDate: 2006-04-12 00:33:33
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group