Re: Inaccurate error message when set fdw batch_size to 0

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inaccurate error message when set fdw batch_size to 0
Date: 2021-07-27 16:32:16
Message-ID: e14e656f-da96-d07a-c8e6-6fafdf6b5e07@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/07/27 15:06, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Thanks for the v8 patch, it LGTM.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2021-07-27 16:49:35 Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-07-27 16:17:49 Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals