2009/1/5 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> 2008/12/31 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>>> RANGE UNBOUNDED PRECEDING -- same as AND CURRENT ROW
>>> ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING -- same as AND CURRENT ROW
>> Is this true?
> 7.11 syntax rule 9 says so. AFAICS general rule 5b doesn't discuss the
> case where <window frame bound 2> isn't present, and doesn't need to
> because of syntax rule 9.
OK, I've just found it and confirmed Oracle does so.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Stephen R. van den Berg||Date: 2009-01-05 01:30:38|
|Subject: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows)|
|Previous:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2009-01-05 00:44:49|
|Subject: Re: generic reloptions improvement|