Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 3WARE Card performance boost?

From: William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 3WARE Card performance boost?
Date: 2006-01-18 22:15:22
Message-ID: dqmelr$ub$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:58:09PM -0800, William Yu wrote:
>> The key is getting a card with the ability to upgrade the onboard ram.
>> Our previous setup was a LSI MegaRAID 320-1 (128MB), 4xRAID10, 
>> fsync=off. Replaced it with a ARC-1170 (1GB) w/ 24x7200RPM SATA2 drives 
>> (split into 3 8-drive RAID6 arrays) and performance for us is through 
>> the ceiling.
> Well, the fact that you went from four to 24 disks would perhaps be a bigger
> factor than the amount of RAM...
> /* Steinar */

Actually no. Our 2xOpteron 244 server is NOT fast enough to drive an 
array this large. That's why we had to split it up into 3 different 
arrays. I tried all different RAID configs and once past about 8 drives, 
I got the same performance no matter what because the CPU was pegged at 
100%. Right now, 2 of the arrays are just mirroring each other because 
we can't seem utilize the performance right now. (Also protects against 
cabling/power supply issues as we're using 3 seperate external enclosures.)

The 1GB RAM is much bigger because it almost completely hides the write 
activity. Looking at iostat while all our jobs are running, there's 
almost no disk activity. If I manually type "sync", I see 1 big 
250MB-500MB write storm for 2 seconds but otherwise, writes just slowly 
dribble out to disk.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-01-18 22:48:56
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum
Previous:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2006-01-18 22:04:51
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group