Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator

From: Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator
Date: 2009-07-15 21:22:49
Message-ID: de22a6520907151422h525abc48qce68618592754aad@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Worked great, vacuumlo finished, a vacuum -full finished amazingly quickly,
very exciting. We're pointing qa apps at it now for testing.
For some reason though, that index has to be rebuilt after running
pg_migrator.

I'll be testing on our 100GB+ prod copy shortly and will let you know if you
want.

Thanks,

Jamie

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>wrote:

> Jamie Fox wrote:
>
> > Hi -
> > REINDEX INDEX pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index;
> >
> > This seems to have fixed the problem, lo_open of lob data is working
> again -
> > now to see how vacuumlo likes it.
>
> So did it work?
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-07-15 21:55:36 Areca 1680 and RHEL/Centos 5.3 issue
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-07-15 20:24:25 Re: savepoints in 8.3.7 or whatever...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Ike de Oliveira 2009-07-15 21:38:31 Re: [PATCH] Psql List Languages
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-07-15 21:03:25 Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07