Re: Rangejoin rebased

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rangejoin rebased
Date: 2018-03-28 18:25:37
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/28/18 2:23 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-03-28 14:18:42 -0400, David Steele wrote:
>> It seems that a new patch is needed here but none has been presented.
>> I've marked this Waiting on Author for the moment, but I really think it
>> should be marked Returned with Feedback and submitted to the next CF
>> when a new patch is ready.
> I'd just do so now. There's not been any progress for months, and
> there's been an update request weeks ago...


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-03-28 18:41:24 Re: PL/pgSQL nested CALL with transactions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-28 18:23:22 Re: Rangejoin rebased