Re: adding "order by" to a "group by" query

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: adding "order by" to a "group by" query
Date: 2008-12-06 17:40:43
Message-ID: dcc563d10812060940q73648b1oa00c8b174804dc24@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Louis-David Mitterrand
<vindex+lists-pgsql-sql(at)apartia(dot)org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 06:26:06PM +0100, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
>> Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-pgsql-sql(at)apartia(dot)org> schrieb:
>> >
>> > But if I append this
>> >
>> > order by pt.type_fr = 'comédien';
>> >
>> > I get this error:
>> >
>> > ERROR: column "pt.type_fr" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function
>> >
>> > It seems I am using pt.type_fr in an aggregate function (array_accum()),
>> > yet I get the error.
>> >
>> > Is there a way to to have a certain pt.type_fr bubble up (or down) in my
>> > search?
>>
>> You can use a subquery like my example:
>>
>> test=*# select i, comma(t) from (select distinct i,t from foo) bar group by i;
>> i | comma
>> ---+---------
>> 1 | a, b, c
>> (1 row)
>>
>> Time: 0.554 ms
>> test=*# select i, comma(t) from (select distinct i,t from foo order by t desc) bar group by i;
>
> Thanks Andreas, that would be good solution.
>
> (still curious about the "must be used in an aggregate function" error
> though... because I do use it in an aggregate)

You can order by the same thing you selected:

select sum(i) from ... group by j order by sum(i)
OR
select sum(i) from ... group by j order by 1 -- 1 stands for the
first select list item...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Kretschmer 2008-12-06 18:23:25 Re: adding "order by" to a "group by" query
Previous Message Louis-David Mitterrand 2008-12-06 17:31:27 Re: adding "order by" to a "group by" query