Re: SERIAL and Primary Key

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: mgould(at)allcoast(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SERIAL and Primary Key
Date: 2008-03-01 01:29:03
Message-ID: dcc563d10802291729t202b5d82s8ef32950e46e3b60@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Mike Gould <mgould(at)allcoast(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> CREATE TABLE "fav5"."batchnumber" (
> "batchnumberid" SERIAL NOT NULL,
> "processtype" SMALLINT NOT NULL,
> "termloc" CHAR(3) NOT NULL,
> "batchno" INTEGER NOT NULL
> ) WITHOUT OIDS;
>
> With the above table definition, is batchnumberid by default also defined as
> the primary key or do I still need to define a separate Primary Key
> constraint?

Once upon a time a serial type was assumed to be a PK (or was that
unique not null???) automagically. However, this was considered bad
form since some uses of sequence did not need those extra settings.

Serial is JUST serial nowadays, and has been for quite some time.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-01 02:04:17 Re: Confused about CASE
Previous Message brian 2008-03-01 00:44:37 Re: pgsql structure export to XML