Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "Consider compacting this relation..." ???

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Kynn Jones" <kynnjo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Consider compacting this relation..." ???
Date: 2008-02-28 23:34:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Kynn Jones <kynnjo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I just ran VACUUM ANALYZE and got this warning I've never seen before:
>  WARNING:  relation "public.some_big_table" contains more than
> "max_fsm_pages" pages with useful free space
> HINT:  Consider compacting this relation or increasing the configuration
> parameter "max_fsm_pages".
> What does the hint mean by "compacting"?  What exactly must I do to compact
> this table?

Vacuum full

>  Also, at the end of the VACUUM ANALYZE run I get the NOTICE:
> NOTICE:  number of page slots needed (294528) exceeds max_fsm_pages (153600)
> HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_fsm_pages" to a
> value over 294528.
> What surprises me here is that even though I've never seen this notice
> before (and I've been running VACUUM ANALYZE a lot lately!), the number of
> page slots needed is almost twice as much as the value of max_fsm_pages.
> What could I have done since the last time I ran VACUUM ANALYZE (not more
> than 24 hours ago) to make this "page slot" requirement to shoot through the
> roof like this?

Lots of deletes or updates on the table.

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Sam MasonDate: 2008-02-29 00:00:20
Subject: Re: WAL Log Size
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-02-28 23:32:52
Subject: Re: LIMIT Question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group