Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations

From: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Date: 2017-12-04 16:14:57
Message-ID: dc586a21-f48b-27ee-0d6c-80aeb6db3e62@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30.11.2017 05:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik
> <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Concerning broken partition_join test: it is "expected" failure: my patch
>> removes from the plans redundant checks.
>> So the only required action is to update expected file with results.
>> Attached please find updated patch.
> The last patch version has conflicts in regression tests and did not
> get any reviews. Please provide a rebased version. I am moving the
> patch to next CF with waiting on author as status. Thanks!

Rebased patch is attached.

--
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
optimizer-5.patch text/x-patch 388.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2017-12-04 16:40:37 Signals in a BGW
Previous Message Alexander Kuzmenkov 2017-12-04 16:03:12 Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause