Re: jsonb subscripting vs SQL/JSON array accessor semantics (SQL:2023)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Alexandra Wang <alexandra(dot)wang(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: jsonb subscripting vs SQL/JSON array accessor semantics (SQL:2023)
Date: 2026-03-31 14:43:00
Message-ID: db03756a-6b10-4868-bf1a-6aa85fdbf1c3@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09.02.26 22:15, Alexandra Wang wrote:
> I'd appreciate more votes on whether this direction makes sense, or if
> there are concerns I've missed.

At the moment, I see no consensus here, in fact, it seems there are more
opinions than options. ;-) I think this is an important topic to
resolve one way or another, and there also appear to be at least some
documentation gaps if not bugs in the existing code. I created a
commitfest entry for this for PG20-1, so we can continue tracking this.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-03-31 14:45:52 Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2026-03-31 14:36:22 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]