From: | Nicolai Tufar <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
Date: | 2005-03-01 14:22:05 |
Message-ID: | d809293905030106226dd66151@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:55:20 -0500 (EST), Bruce Momjian
> My next guess
> is that Win32 isn't handling va_arg(..., long long int) properly.
>
I am trying various combination of number and types
of parameters in my test program and everything prints fine.
When it comes to pg, it fails :(
> > template1=# select * from test where x > 1000::int8;
> > x
> > ------------
> > -869367531
> > (1 row)
I am not too fluent in source code, could someone
point me to there actual call to snprintf() is being done
when a query like this is executed. I could not find it myslef
:(
Regards,
Nick
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-01 14:29:07 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-01 14:18:11 | Re: mysterious log output |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-01 14:29:07 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-01 05:55:20 | Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail |