|From:||"Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>|
|To:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>|
|Cc:||Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 15.03.2023 21:29, Gregory Stark (as CFM) wrote:
> These patches that are "Needs Review" and have received no comments at
> all since before March 1st are these. If your patch is amongst this
> list I would suggest any of:
> 1) Move it yourself to the next CF (or withdraw it)
> 2) Post to the list with any pending questions asking for specific
> feedback -- it's much more likely to get feedback than just a generic
> "here's a patch plz review"...
> 3) Mark it Ready for Committer and possibly post explaining the
> resolution to any earlier questions to make it easier for a committer
> to understand the state
There are two different patch variants and some discussion expected.
So moved them to the next CF.
With the best wishes!
Anton A. Melnikov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
|Next Message||Andrei Zubkov||2023-03-16 12:39:24||Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements|
|Previous Message||Amit Kapila||2023-03-16 12:25:22||Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication|