|From:||Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|To:||Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>|
|Subject:||Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 2018/03/22 20:48, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> Thanks. It's looking much better now.
> I think we can possibly move all ON
> CONFLICT related members to a separate structure and just copy the pointer
> to the structure if (map == NULL). That might make the code a bit more tidy.
OK, I tried that in the attached updated patch.
> Is there anything that needs to be done for transition tables? I checked
> and didn't see anything, but please check.
There doesn't seem to be anything that this patch has to do for transition
tables. If you look at the tests I added in triggers.sql which exercise
INSERT ON CONFLICT's interaction with transition tables, you can see that
we get the same output for a partitioned table as we get for a normal table.
|Next Message||Peter Eisentraut||2018-03-23 02:23:49||Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use|
|Previous Message||Peter Eisentraut||2018-03-23 02:17:29||Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use|