Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process
Date: 2020-02-22 15:12:27
Message-ID: d12686c6-7566-8190-8fb0-af4927e8e4fe@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-02-17 18:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-02-03 13:47, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Comment:
>>
>> - It'd be good to split out the feature independent refactorings, like
>> the introduction of InitControlFile(), into their own commit. Right
>> now it's hard to separate out what should just should be moved code,
>> and what should be behavioural changes. Especially when there's stuff
>> like just reindenting comments as part of the patch.
>
> Agreed. Here are three refactoring patches extracted that seem useful
> on their own.

These have been committed.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-02-22 16:39:31 Re: Function to track shmem reinit time
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-02-22 15:06:57 Re: reindex concurrently and two toast indexes