Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-02-18 23:27:07
Message-ID: cv5tl5$1njl$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:08:47AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>* Christopher Kings-Lynne (chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au) wrote:
>>>PostgreSQL has replication, but not partitioning (which is what you want).
>>It doesn't have multi-server partitioning..  It's got partitioning
>>within a single server (doesn't it?  I thought it did, I know it was
>>discussed w/ the guy from Cox Communications and I thought he was using
>>it :).
> No, PostgreSQL doesn't support any kind of partitioning, unless you
> write it yourself. I think there's some work being done in this area,
> though.

Seen my last attempts to perform an horizontal partition I have to say
that postgres do not support it even if you try to write it yourself
(see my post "horizontal partion" ).

Gaetano Mendola

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-02-19 04:11:08
Subject: Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown
Previous:From: Gaetano MendolaDate: 2005-02-18 23:20:08
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group