Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tyan Thunder MB for postgres server

From: William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tyan Thunder MB for postgres server
Date: 2004-12-14 07:09:10
Message-ID: cpm3lc$1r1m$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
I've used a slew of LSI controllers (22915A, integrated 53C1010,
22320-R, MegaRAID 320-1) and they've all performed w/o issues. Now I
have had some hardware die though. One was probably our fault -- during
an attempted upgrade, we probably weren't careful enough with the
22320-R (cramped #(at)#@$! rackmounts) and after we reinstalled it, it just
never worked right again.

Otherwise, if you leave it alone, they work pretty good. I've got a 4
15K disks (software RAID10) attached to a 22915A in a 2x Opteron 244
server running FC2 64-bit.  This machine is deadly fast; every so often, 
iostat will show peak transfer rates of 160MB/s. (RAID
cage+rackmount problems stopped us from upgrading to hardware
raid+battery -- we'll tackle this again when we get a 4U case.)

Iain wrote:

> Hi Ericson,
> I'm planning on using the onboard LSI SCSI controller, and have read 
> alot about poor IO performance on Dells using LSI. Then  again, most of 
> the talk about Adaptec hasn't been all that complimentary either as I 
> saw it ;-) It seems that there is more to it than the name of the chip 
> vendor. I havn't heard anything bad about the Tyan opteron based boards 
> in any configuration yet though.

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2004-12-14 15:30:01
Subject: Re: Tyan Thunder MB for postgres server
Previous:From: Marek LewczukDate: 2004-12-14 06:54:58
Subject: Re: plperl loading

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group