| From: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Best use of second controller with faster disks? |
| Date: | 2007-06-14 02:36:19 |
| Message-ID: | cone.1181788579.306254.63059.1000@zoraida.natserv.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Vivek Khera writes:
> FreeBSD, indeed. The vendor, Partners Data Systems, did a wonderful
This one?
http://www.partnersdata.com
> job ensuring that everything integrated well to the point of talking
> with various FreeBSD developers, LSI engineers, etc., and sent me a
> fully tested system end-to-end with a Sun X4100 M2, LSI 4Gb Fibre
> card, and their RAID array, with FreeBSD installed already.
Is there a management program in FreeBSD for the Areca card?
So I understand the setup you are describing..
Machine has Areca controller
Connects to external enclosure
Enclosure has LSI controller
> I have separate disks built-in to the system for boot.
How did you get FreeBSD to newfs such a large setup?
newfs -s /dev/raw-disk?
What are the speed/size of the disks?
7K rpm?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sabin Coanda | 2007-06-14 14:31:26 | Parsing VACUUM VERBOSE |
| Previous Message | Mark Makarowsky | 2007-06-13 19:47:36 | Re: Update table performance problem |