Re: Add timeline to partial WAL segments

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add timeline to partial WAL segments
Date: 2018-12-13 17:48:36
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/13/18 8:35 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 12/12/18 7:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:54:05AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
>>> But, we could at least use the . notation and end up with something like
>>> 000000010000000100000001.00000002.partial or perhaps
>>> 000000010000000100000001.T00000002.partial? Maybe
>>> 000000010000000100000001.00000002.tpartial?

I updated the patch to use 000000010000000100000001.00000002.partial
since this is more consistent with what we do in other cases.


Attachment Content-Type Size
add-timeline-to-partial-v2.patch text/plain 3.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-12-13 17:58:02 Re: Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-12-13 17:35:15 Is DLIST_STATIC_INIT() a net loss?