| From: | "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,"Vaishnavi Prabakaran" <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>,"David Steele" <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>,"Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>,"Haribabu Kommi" <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>,"Dmitry Igrishin" <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>,"PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Manuel Kniep" <m(dot)kniep(at)web(dot)de>,"fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>,"Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
| Date: | 2017-06-22 17:42:11 |
| Message-ID: | cd2c6d7d-6b16-45e0-9bd4-d403bbbe9056@manitou-mail.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund wrote:
> > One option may be to leave that decision to the user by providing a
> > PQBatchAutoFlush(true|false) property, along with a PQBatchFlush()
> > function.
>
> What'd be the difference between PQflush() and PQbatchFlush()?
I guess no difference, I was just not seeing that libpq already provides
this functionality...
Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-22 17:45:34 | Re: shift_sjis_2004 related autority files are remaining |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-22 17:41:41 | Re: possible self-deadlock window after bad ProcessStartupPacket |