| From: | Thomas F(dot)O'Connell <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PGSQL Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ken Reid <Ken(at)homegain(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Killing Processes |
| Date: | 2005-04-23 16:33:55 |
| Message-ID: | cbf589c2fd04e34b3b01281c64a0d6fa@sitening.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Oops. That's right. I was relying on memory, which is less reliable
than man. Fortunately, I always consult man before killing... :P
-tfo
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC
Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™
http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-260-0005
On Apr 23, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 10:58:46AM -0500, Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
>>
>> It is generally not recommended that you kill processes with anything
>> stronger than HUP, which is (I believe) what kill sends by default.
>
> kill usually sends TERM by default, not HUP.
>
> (I say "usually" only because I haven't personally examined every
> implementation of kill in existence. Every one I've used sends
> TERM by default and I haven't heard of any that work otherwise.)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-04-23 18:00:11 | Re: Killing Processes |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-04-23 16:16:41 | Re: Killing Processes |