From: | Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions |
Date: | 2010-03-23 23:07:07 |
Message-ID: | ca24673e1003231607k11138834qb9a5d4283b06c047@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
What about InnoDB?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> So has anyone looked at porting MythTV to PG?
>>
>>
>
> Periodically someone hacks together something that works, last big effort
> I'm aware of was in 2006, and then it bit rots away. I'm sure we'd get some
> user uptake on the result--MySQL corruption is one of the top ten cause of a
> MythTV system crashing. The developers are so resistant to database-neutral
> design that you'd need quite the thick skin to try and get something into
> their mainline though, which means someone who tried adding PostgreSQL
> support would likely have to run a parallel branch for some time, expecting
> regular breakage. The only thing on their radar as far as I know is SQLite.
>
> There was a good overview circa 2004 at
> http://david.hardeman.nu/files/patches/mythtv/mythletter.txt , haven't
> done a deep dive into the code recently enough to comment on exactly what
> has changed since then. That gives a flavor for the fundamentals of the
> design issues though.
>
> --
> Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
> greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bhella Paramjeet-PFCW67 | 2010-03-23 23:28:03 | Re: tuning auto vacuum for highly active tables |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-03-23 21:41:48 | Re: tuning auto vacuum for highly active tables |