Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-12-08 08:57:31
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/12/08 3:20, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>>> My bad. The fix I sent last night for one of the cache flush issues
>>> wasn't quite right. The attached seems to fix it.
>> Yes, fixed here too. Thanks.
> Thanks for the report - that was a good catch.
> I've committed 0001 - 0006 with that correction and a few other
> adjustments. There's plenty of room for improvement here, and almost
> certainly some straight-up bugs too, but I think we're at a point
> where it will be easier and less error-prone to commit follow on
> changes incrementally rather than by continuously re-reviewing a very
> large patch set for increasingly smaller changes.

Attached is a patch to fix some stale comments in the code and a minor
correction to one of the examples on the CREATE TABLE page.


Attachment Content-Type Size
misc-comment-doc-fixes.patch text/x-diff 3.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2016-12-08 09:32:47 Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2016-12-08 08:55:45 Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol