|From:||Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|To:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>|
|Cc:||Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: Declarative partitioning - another take|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 2016/12/08 3:20, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>>> My bad. The fix I sent last night for one of the cache flush issues
>>> wasn't quite right. The attached seems to fix it.
>> Yes, fixed here too. Thanks.
> Thanks for the report - that was a good catch.
> I've committed 0001 - 0006 with that correction and a few other
> adjustments. There's plenty of room for improvement here, and almost
> certainly some straight-up bugs too, but I think we're at a point
> where it will be easier and less error-prone to commit follow on
> changes incrementally rather than by continuously re-reviewing a very
> large patch set for increasingly smaller changes.
Attached is a patch to fix some stale comments in the code and a minor
correction to one of the examples on the CREATE TABLE page.
|Next Message||Masahiko Sawada||2016-12-08 09:32:47||Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.|
|Previous Message||Heikki Linnakangas||2016-12-08 08:55:45||Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol|