Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results (460% improvement)

From: Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)openscg(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results (460% improvement)
Date: 2017-03-05 21:09:44
Message-ID: c70c99a6-c5bd-e898-578f-d87af666b3a8@openscg.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/28/17 9:42 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>
>> I'll post a plpython patch that doesn't add the output format control.
>
> I've attached the results of that. Unfortunately the speed improvement
> is only 27% at this point (with 9999999 tuples). Presumably that's
> because it's constructing a brand new dictionary from scratch for each
> tuple.

I found a couple bugs. New patches attached.
--
Jim Nasby, Chief Data Architect, OpenSCG

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-SPI_execute_callback-and-callback-based-DestRece.patch text/plain 8.7 KB
0002-Modify-plpython-to-use-SPI-callbacks.patch text/plain 13.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2017-03-05 21:10:45 Re: objsubid vs subobjid
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2017-03-05 21:07:07 Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results