Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Date: 2017-09-29 13:04:51
Message-ID: c48af890-8fc3-f143-7e65-0b2590cf9b21@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/22/17 16:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/19/17 19:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> To get things rolling, I have committed just the basic TAP tests, to
>>> give it a spin on the build farm. I'll work through the rest in the
>>> coming days.
>
> I have reverted this because of the build farm issue. Putting the patch
> on hold in the CF until we have a new plan.

Set to "Returned with feedback" now.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-29 13:06:22 Re: Patch: add --if-exists to pg_recvlogical
Previous Message Sokolov Yura 2017-09-29 12:19:23 Re: Walsender timeouts and large transactions