Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation
Date: 2022-06-28 07:18:05
Message-ID: c2727e30-a3d3-465f-f253-bfff81611a21@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 6/27/22 7:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2022-Jun-25, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/src/include/miscadmin.h b/src/include/miscadmin.h
>> index 0af130fbc5..8d761512fd 100644
>> --- a/src/include/miscadmin.h
>> +++ b/src/include/miscadmin.h
>> @@ -364,6 +364,10 @@ extern void InitializeSessionUserIdStandalone(void);
>> extern void SetSessionAuthorization(Oid userid, bool is_superuser);
>> extern Oid GetCurrentRoleId(void);
>> extern void SetCurrentRoleId(Oid roleid, bool is_superuser);
>> +/* kluge to avoid including libpq/libpq-be.h here */
>> +typedef struct Port MyPort;
>> +extern void InitializeSystemUser(const MyPort *port);
>> +extern const char* GetSystemUser(void);
> This typedef here looks quite suspicious. I think this should suffice:
>
> +/* kluge to avoid including libpq/libpq-be.h here */
> +struct Port;
> +extern void InitializeSystemUser(struct Port *port);
>
> I suspect that having a typedef called MyPort is going to wreak serious
> havoc for pgindent.

Good catch, thanks!

Attached new version to fix it as suggested.

Regards,

Bertrand

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0003-system_user-implementation.patch text/plain 17.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-06-28 07:20:43 RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-06-28 07:09:26 Re: [BUG] Panic due to incorrect missingContrecPtr after promotion