| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication, loose ends |
| Date: | 2010-01-15 17:59:05 |
| Message-ID: | c24c7ec603a375862182eeecc9123e27@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
>>>> +1, it is not replication. I would call it something like continuous
>>>> archiving or streaming pitr
I agree we should consider a different name.
> But I'm still wondering why this isn't replication.
Because replication is an ambiguous and overloaded term.
On the other hand, it's a great buzzword, so we should use
the phrase as much as possible in the press releases. :)
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001151257
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAktQrNYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj8NACgwIQVq/GGQoY/4U6pAYyR5IeS
EsoAoLjoYlLErv4g3Vy65rbA9u9W0vww
=u2Hk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-15 18:03:53 | Re: Streaming replication status |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-01-15 17:53:57 | Re: Application name patch - v3 |