Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL data on a NAS device ?

From: William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL data on a NAS device ?
Date: 2003-10-21 16:12:14
Message-ID: bn3lt1$107r$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
> I have never worked with a XEON CPU before. Does anyone know how it performs
> running PostgreSQL 7.3.4 / 7.4 on RedHat 9 ? Is it faster than a Pentium 4?
> I believe the main difference is cache memory, right? Aside from cache mem,
> it's basically a Pentium 4, or am I wrong?

Well, see the problem is of course, there's so many flavors of P4s and 
Xeons that it's hard to tell which is faster unless you specify the 
exact model. And even then, it would depend on the workload. Would a 
Xeon/3GHz/2MB L3/400FSB be faster than a P4C/3GHz/800FSB? No idea as no 
one has complete number breakdowns on these comparisons. Oh yeah, you 
could get a big round number that says on SPEC or something one CPU is 
faster than the other but whether that's faster for Postgres and your PG 
app is a totally different story.

That in mind, I wouldn't worry about it. The CPU is probably plenty fast 
for what you need to do. I'd look into two things in the server: memory 
and CPU expandability. I know you already plan on 4GB but you may need 
even more in the future. Few things can dramatically improve performance 
more than moving disk access to disk cache. And if there's a 2nd socket 
where you can pop another CPU in, that would leave you extra room if 
your server becomes CPU limited.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-10-21 16:20:44
Subject: Re: Tuning for mid-size server
Previous:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2003-10-21 15:56:50
Subject: Re: Tuning for mid-size server

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group