Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: listagg aggregate

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Date: 2010-02-01 13:51:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1 February 2010 13:40, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> 2010/2/1 Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > I noticed that the regression test results don't include the following
> case:
> >
> > select string_agg(a) from (values(null),(null)) g(a);
> >
> > There is one similar where a delimiter is provided.
> >
> > Which leads me to ask for clarification, would it be safe to assume that
> > string_agg can never itself return null?
> if all values are null, then result is null.
> Pavel
Ah, I was looking at the expected results, and couldn't see a NULL outcome,
but then these aren't indicated in such results anyway.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-02-01 14:03:52
Subject: Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-02-01 13:40:50
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group