| From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Date: | 2010-01-21 10:54:02 |
| Message-ID: | bddc86151001210254y43d78fd2o8b81312e01bf48f0@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/21 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>
> Wait for it....
>
> 9.0.
>
>
>
I feel sorry for 8.5 now. It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
version.
So, does this mean the next alpha/beta will be named 9.0 too?
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-01-21 10:57:35 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-01-21 10:39:39 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-01-21 10:57:35 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2010-01-21 10:42:30 | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |