Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Spoofing as the postmaster

From: "Mike Rylander" <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Tomasz Ostrowski" <tometzky(at)batory(dot)org(dot)pl>
Subject: Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
Date: 2007-12-22 18:51:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Dec 22, 2007 1:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Wouldn't SSL work over Unix-domain sockets as well?  The API only deals with
> > file descriptors.
> Hmm ... we've always thought of SSL as being primarily comm security
> and thus useless on a Unix socket, but the mutual authentication aspect
> could come in handy as an answer for this type of threat.  Anyone want
> to try this and see if it really works or not?
> Does OpenSSL have a mode where it only does mutual auth and not
> encryption?  The encryption would be wasted cycles in this scenario,
> so being able to turn it off would be nice.

miker(at)whirly:~$ openssl ciphers -v  'NULL'
NULL-SHA                SSLv3 Kx=RSA      Au=RSA  Enc=None      Mac=SHA1
NULL-MD5                SSLv3 Kx=RSA      Au=RSA  Enc=None      Mac=MD5

I see no way to turn off the message digest, but maybe that's just an
added benefit.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marko KreenDate: 2007-12-22 19:03:54
Subject: Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-12-22 18:04:47
Subject: Re: Spoofing as the postmaster

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group