| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace |
| Date: | 2021-12-15 12:41:16 |
| Message-ID: | b7988566-daa2-80ed-2fdc-6f6630462d26@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03.08.21 19:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net> writes:
>> Sorry I have missed that, but I'm fine with this implemenation so let's
>> keep the v6 version of the patch and drop this one.
>
> Pushed, then. There's still lots of time to tweak the behavior of course.
I have a documentation follow-up to this. It seems that these new
functions are almost a de facto standard, whereas the SQL-standard
functions are not implemented anywhere. I propose the attached patch to
update the subsection in the pattern-matching section to give more
detail on this and suggest equivalent functions among these newly added
ones. What do you think?
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-doc-More-documentation-on-regular-expressions-and-SQ.patch | text/plain | 6.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2021-12-15 12:51:44 | Re: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress |
| Previous Message | Shay Rojansky | 2021-12-15 12:35:24 | Privilege required for IF EXISTS event if the object already exists |