| From: | "Peter Kovacs" <maxottovonstirlitz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Carlos Moreno" <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? |
| Date: | 2007-02-27 00:11:24 |
| Message-ID: | b6e8f2e80702261611j598b1771g3dbcfc9bb1f9cdf2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 2/26/07, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 23:11 +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> > A related question:
> > Is it sufficient to disable write cache only on the disk where pg_xlog
> > is located? Or should write cache be disabled on both disks?
> >
>
> When PostgreSQL does a checkpoint, it thinks the data pages before the
> checkpoint have successfully made it to disk.
>
> If the write cache holds those data pages, and then loses them, there's
> no way for PostgreSQL to recover. So use a battery backed cache or turn
> off the write cache.
Sorry for for not being familar with storage techonologies... Does
"battery" here mean battery in the common sense of the word - some
kind of independent power supply? Shouldn't the disk itself be backed
by a battery? As should the entire storage subsystem?
Thanks
Peter
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-02-27 00:25:14 | Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-02-26 21:51:06 | Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? |