Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <Josh(dot)Berkus(at)sun(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
Date: 2007-10-29 01:18:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/27/07, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> The only way I've done multisets is by creating functions that return
> multiple refcursors, either in a row or as SETOF.  Is or was there
> some other way?

<ahem>...arrays of composite type :-)


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2007-10-29 01:22:46
Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
Previous:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2007-10-29 01:03:59
Subject: Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group