| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL List Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "postgresql performance list" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers |
| Date: | 2007-07-25 01:28:00 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150707241828h778e235em62e9c5fdfabc9509@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
On 7/20/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in
> > my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be
> > even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I want
> > complete 8.2 -> 8.3 numbers).
>
> We've done it on TPCE, which is a hard benchmark for PostgreSQL. On
> that it's +9% without HOT and +13% with HOT. I think SpecJ would show a
> greater difference, but we're still focussed on benchmarks we can
> publish (i.e. 8.2.4) right now.
Are there any industry standard benchmarks that you know of which
PostgreSQL excels at?
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-07-25 03:42:58 | Re: Updated tsearch documentation |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-07-24 20:58:50 | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-25 02:45:58 | Re: Performance issue with 8.2.3 - "C" application |
| Previous Message | Karl Denninger | 2007-07-25 01:20:09 | Performance issue with 8.2.3 - "C" application |