Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks

From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: david(at)lang(dot)hm
Cc: "Arjen van der Meijden" <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>, "Christian Nicolaisen" <blackbrrd(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
Date: 2008-01-29 08:06:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
> I missed the initial post in this thread, but I haven't seen any 15K rpm
> 2.5" drives, so if you compare 10K rpm 2.5" drives with 15K rpm 3.5"
> drives you will see differences (depending on your workload and controller
> cache)

I have some 15K rpm 2.5" sas-drives from HP. Other vendors have them as well.


When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: davidDate: 2008-01-29 08:32:25
Subject: Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2008-01-29 02:56:40
Subject: Re: Hard Drive Usage for Speeding up Big Queries

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group