Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs

From: "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
To: "vignesh C" <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs
Date: 2024-01-30 14:29:37
Message-ID: b3609dbf-5880-4ead-bb83-c1ccea7c879d@manitou-mail.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

vignesh C wrote:

> patching file src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 191.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt.rej
>
> Please post an updated version for the same.

PFA a rebased version.

Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
https://postgresql.verite.pro/
Twitter: @DanielVerite

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Implement-retrieval-of-results-in-chunks-with-lib.patch text/plain 18.6 KB
v6-0002-Reimplement-FETCH_COUNT-with-the-chunked-mode-in-.patch text/plain 20.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-01-30 14:36:06 Re: scram_iterations is undocumented GUC_REPORT
Previous Message jian he 2024-01-30 14:15:20 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes