Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules
Date: 2005-04-26 06:05:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Apr 25, 2005, at 11:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> DO INSTEAD means that the *original* query will not execute; it does
> not suppress actions produced by other rules.


> If we did not define
> it that way, I think your example would have to error out --- how
> would you choose which INSTEAD rule wins?

The documentation says that they evaluate in alphabetical order by 
name. So I would expect that the first one to have its WHERE statement 
evaluate to true would short-circuit the execution of the remaining 



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-04-26 06:10:39
Subject: Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules
Previous:From: Qingqing ZhouDate: 2005-04-26 06:03:17
Subject: Re: simplify register_dirty_segment()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group