Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions
Date: 2020-02-19 20:23:12
Message-ID: b0c0dbbd-9142-6bf8-4483-3a46360c55d3@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-02-17 20:08, Daniel Verite wrote:
> Concerning execution speed, there's an excessive CPU usage when
> normalizing into NFC or NFKC. Looking at pre-existing code, it looks
> like recompose_code() in unicode_norm.c looping over the
> UnicodeDecompMain array might be very costly.

Yes, this is a known issue and I think room for future optimization work.

> Another point is that the ICU-based implementation appears
> to be significantly faster in all cases, which makes me wonder
> why ICU builds should not just use ICU instead of the PG-core
> implementation.

That would require linking libpq to ICU (for SASLprep), and in general
would either make ICU required or require maintaining multiple
implementations. I don't think we're there yet.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-02-19 20:38:21 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Previous Message Misha Patel 2020-02-19 20:13:01 Open Source Hackathon Mentorship Invitation