| From: | "alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de" <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 'Bingshuai Li' <lucian1412(at)outlook(dot)com>, Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Rachitskiy <pl0h0yp1(at)gmail(dot)com>, "a(dot)kozhemyakin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru" <a(dot)kozhemyakin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in logical decoding with DDL and subtransactions |
| Date: | 2026-10-14 18:15:28 |
| Message-ID: | as_FwZjm4gZ6_cAz@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-Oct-09, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Also, while thinking on it, I started to think whether we have to clean up
> Tuplecids even if the transactions will be skipped. In this case transactions are
> Not replied thus the issue won't happen, right?
Yeah, I think that's correct. I was wondering myself if the 2PC case is
correct -- we call ReorderBufferCleanupAbortedTupleCids() only when
two_phase is false. Do we call DecodeAbort() again for those? I am not
familiar with the 2PC support here. The comment for DecodeAbort() could
be better for sure.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2026-10-14 19:14:01 | Re: Parallel autovacuum: honor reduced parallel workers after heap scan phase |
| Previous Message | Haibo Yan | 2026-10-14 18:12:57 | Re: Perf: Specialize ExecIndexOnlyScan() like ExecSeqScan() |