Re: Be strict when request to flush past end of WAL in WaitXLogInsertionsToFinish

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Paul Kim <mok03127(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Be strict when request to flush past end of WAL in WaitXLogInsertionsToFinish
Date: 2026-09-03 02:04:39
Message-ID: apjVt1zRvz5UN3CQ@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 06:13:26PM -0700, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Nice! Do you mind adding the reproducer as a TAP test for HEAD?

I'm assuming that it should be possible to use an injection points
based on the fact that we would be up and running for the inserts.
Even if the test is not included into the tree at the end, it's still
good to post cases to be able to double-check a fix, and even in the
case where we would need to look back at this problem due to a
completely reason.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2026-09-03 02:23:00 Re: Report index currently being vacuumed in pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-09-03 02:01:49 Re: auto-vectorize varbit bitwise operators