Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4

On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just upgraded with pg_dump/restore from PostgreSQL 8.3.11 to 8.4.4 but I'm
>> having major performance problems with a query with many left joins. Problem
>> is that costs are now very, very, very high (was ok in 8.3). Analyze has
>> been done. Indexes are of course there.
>>
>>  ->  Merge Left Join
>> (cost=1750660.22..4273805884876845789194861338991916289697885665127154313046252183850255795798561612107149662486528.00
>> rows=238233578115856634454073334945297075430094545596765511255148896328828230572227215727052643001958400
>> width=16)
>>        Merge Cond: (l.id = d2000903.fk_id)
>
> Wow! Other than an incredibly high cost AND row estimate, was the
> query plan the same on 8.3 or different?
>
>> Details with execution plan can be found at:
>> http://www.wiesinger.com/tmp/pg_perf_84.txt
>
> What's up with the "(actual time=.. rows= loops=) " in the explain analyze?

What do you mean exactly? missing?
I did it not with psql but with a GUI program.

>
>> I know that the data model is key/value pairs but it worked well in 8.3. I
>> need this flexibility.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>
> Not really. I would like an explain analyze from both 8.3 and 8.4.
> Are they tuned the same, things like work mem and default stats
> target?

I don't have a 8.3 version running anymore. But I'm havin an OLD version
of a nearly exactly query plan (The sort was missing due to performance
issues and it done now in a view, maybe also some more JOINS are added,
but all that doesn't have impacts on the basic principle of the query
plan):
http://www.wiesinger.com/tmp/pg_perf.txt

Tuning: Yes, on same machine with same parameters (manual diff on old
config and added manually the parameters again).

Thnx.

Ciao,
Gerhard

--
http://www.wiesinger.com/