On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Adrian Moisey wrote:
>>> Which scheduler is recommended for a box that is dedicated to running
>>> I've asked google and found no answers.
>> Is it the OS itself?
> Yes, in linux. I've found that cfq or deadline is best, but I haven't seen
> anyone try a benchmark
it also depends on your hardware. if you have a good battery-backed cache
on your I/O system you may be best off with 'none' (or simple elevator, I
don't remember the exact name)
the more complexity in your I/O that the kernek oesn't know about, the
less likely it is to make the right decision.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Luke Lonergan||Date: 2008-01-22 08:45:45|
|Subject: Re: scheduler|
|Previous:||From: Florian Weimer||Date: 2008-01-22 08:32:25|
|Subject: Re: 8.3 synchronous_commit|