| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: rand48 replacement |
| Date: | 2021-09-25 07:40:50 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2109250938560.3216312@pseudo |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Aleksander,
>> Attached a v10 which is some kind of compromise where the interface uses
>> inclusive min and max bounds, so that all values can be reached.
>
> Just wanted to let you know that cfbot [1] doesn't seem to be happy with
> the patch. Apparently, some tests are falling. To be honest, I didn't
> invest too much time into investigating this. Hopefully, it's not a big
> deal.
>
> [1]: http://cfbot.cputube.org/
Indeed. I wish that these results would be available from the cf
interface.
Attached a v11 which might improve things.
Thanks for the ping!
--
Fabien.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| prng-11.patch | text/x-diff | 55.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2021-09-25 07:45:08 | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-09-25 07:23:11 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |