|From:||Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>|
|To:||Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>|
|Cc:||PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: rand48 replacement|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
>> Attached a v10 which is some kind of compromise where the interface uses
>> inclusive min and max bounds, so that all values can be reached.
> Just wanted to let you know that cfbot  doesn't seem to be happy with
> the patch. Apparently, some tests are falling. To be honest, I didn't
> invest too much time into investigating this. Hopefully, it's not a big
> : http://cfbot.cputube.org/
Indeed. I wish that these results would be available from the cf
Attached a v11 which might improve things.
Thanks for the ping!
|Next Message||vignesh C||2021-09-25 07:45:08||Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication|
|Previous Message||Amit Kapila||2021-09-25 07:23:11||Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side|