| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18 |
| Date: | 2016-02-22 13:11:05 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.10.1602221402570.19971@sto |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I did a quick & small test with random updates on 16 tables with
> checkpoint_flush_after=16 checkpoint_timeout=30
Another run with more "normal" settings and over 1000 seconds, so less
"quick & small" that the previous one.
checkpoint_flush_after = 16
checkpoint_timeout = 5min # default
shared_buffers = 2GB # 1/8 of available memory
Random updates on 16 tables which total to 1.1GB of data, so this is in
buffer, no significant "read" traffic.
(1) with 16 tablespaces (1 per table) on 1 disk : 680.0 tps
per second avg, stddev [ min q1 median d3 max ] <=300tps
679.6 ± 750.4 [0.0, 317.0, 371.0, 438.5, 2724.0] 19.5%
(2) with 1 tablespace on 1 disk : 956.0 tps
per second avg, stddev [ min q1 median d3 max ] <=300tps
956.2 ± 796.5 [3.0, 488.0, 583.0, 742.0, 2774.0] 2.1%
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-02-22 13:16:24 | Re: Writing new unit tests with PostgresNode |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-02-22 12:21:45 | Re: Writing new unit tests with PostgresNode |