|From:||Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>|
|To:||Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
>> Obviously this would work. I did not think the special case was worth the
>> extra argument. This one has some oddity too, because the second argument is
>> ignored depending on the third. Do as you feel.
> Actually my question was whether keeping the original start_time was the
> intended design.
Sorry I misunderstood the question.
The answer is essentially yes, the field is needed for the "aggregated"
mode where this specific behavior is used.
However, after some look at the code I think that it is possible to do
I also spotted an small issue under low tps where the last aggregation was
With the attached version these problems have been removed, no conditional
initialization. There is also a small diff with the version you sent.
|Next Message||Dilip Kumar||2016-01-27 15:27:00||Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex|
|Previous Message||Jinhua Luo||2016-01-27 15:18:20||Re: insert/update performance|